Metropolitan Transportation Commission
Regional Airport System Plan
Environmental Study, June 1995

excerpts

Page 15, General Aviation Airports

These airports do not host scheduled air carrier or commuter service, and have only minimal air cargo activity. Mostly, they accommodate private or corporate aircraft and limited air taxi service. General aviation airports are generally smaller than the commercial use airports. A few general aviation, airports, such as Hayward (543 acres), Napa County (800 acres), Livermore (510), compare in acreage with Buchanan Field (578 acres), but most are between 50 and 250 acres.

Page 29, Table 2, Airport Facilities Changes (1990 and 2010 Project)

San Jose Airport
19902010
Annual Runway Capacity (operations)362,000362,000
Number of Airline Gates3151
Vehicle Parking Capacity8,25016,500
General Aviation Based Aircraft Capacity670268

Page 29, General Aviation System


General aviation airports do not host scheduled air carrier or commuter service, and also do not have air cargo activity. Most of these facilities accommodate private or corporate aircraft and limited air taxi service. As a system, Bay Area general aviation airports are currently operating at about 46% of their annual runway capacity and about 79% of based aircraft parking capacity; future projections indicate the region's general aviation airports would operate at about 59% of their annual runway capacity and 87% of their aircraft parking capacity.

Overall, the RASP endorses the airport Master Plan alternative for the general aviation component. Under this direction, only three general aviation airports (Concord, San Carlos, and San Jose) would reach based aircraft capacity by year 2010. No significant runway capacity improvements are required, as it is anticipated that airfield capacity would be adequate to meet the future demand. The Master Plan approach would encourage a proportional shift of based aircraft and aircraft operations to outlying general aviation airports. This shift would create a system that results in more flight activity in the least congested portions of the Bay Area's available airspace. The Master Plan alternative would also provide a significant increase in enclosed aircraft hangar space.

Since general aviation facilities are not expected to operate near their capacity, most airports have the capability to accommodate additional activity. One key role of these airports will be to complement the capacity of the air carrier airports by providing alternative facilities for general aviation users, i.e., to serve as "reliever" airports for the air carrier airports. In addition, other potential uses of the region's general aviation airports could include: providing suitable sites for selected air cargo activity, tilt rotor or helicopter services, and remote ground access terminals with parking and express bus service to air carrier airports.

Other recommendations relate to airport-specific issues. Reid-Hillview Airport should be preserved as a general aviation reliever airport or a replacement facility with equivalent capacity developed elsewhere within Santa Clara County. (The Reid-Hillview airport has been discussed for closure). Also the South County Airport could be developed to serve substantially greater activity than contemplated in the existing airport Master Plan. As runway constraints become more critical at San Jose Airport, South County's Master Plan should be revisited to determine if this facility could provide the needed diversion of operations and based aircraft from San Jose Airport.

Page 32, Moffett Field - RASP Update recommendations are:

Moffett Field has been excessed by the Department of Defense and taken over by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

Other (non-NASA) tenants using the airfield include the Army, Navy and Marine Reserves and the National Guard. Several high technology companies performing work for NASA and other government agencies will continue to use the airfield as well. The use of Moffett Field will likely be limited to these users in the foreseeable future.

As a reliever airport for San Jose, Moffett Field does not appear to offer any enhanced instrument capability during IFR conditions because of airspace conflicts associated with its proximity to San Jose.

Use of Moffett Field for a broader spectrum of aviation activity, including general aviation, should be left open for consideration in the future to the extent that it does not significantly conflict with the nature or requirements of federal operations at Moffett.

Moffett Field is retained in the RASP as a general aviation reliever airport. As such, the BCDC should also retain the site's designation as an "airport priority use area" in its "San Francisco Bay Plan". In implementing this policy, MTC will discourage any action which would interfere with the airfield's ability to fulfill this role.